发布: 2024/05/24 00:14 阅读: 818
Home / News / Breaking: Coinbase Loses Supreme Court Case Over Dogecoin Dispute
首页 / 新闻 / 突发事件:Coinbase 因狗狗币纠纷在最高法院败诉
Breaking: Coinbase Loses Supreme Court Case Over Dogecoin Dispute
突发:Coinbase 因狗狗币纠纷在最高法院败诉
The US Supreme Court has ruled against crypto exchange Coinbase, stating that the exchange cannot force users into arbitration related to a Dogecoin sweepstakes.
美国最高法院对加密货币交易所 Coinbase 做出了不利裁决,称该交易所不能强迫用户就狗狗币抽奖活动进行仲裁。
By
经过
Varinder Singh
瓦林德·辛格
9 mins ago
9 分钟前
Highlights
强调
In a landmark decision on May 23, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against crypto exchange Coinbase regarding a dispute related to a $1.2 million Dogecoin sweepstakes held in 2021. The Supreme Court stated that a California court had correctly exercised its authority to determine whether Coinbase could compel users into arbitration.
Coinbase 在 2021 年狗狗币抽奖案中败诉,最高法院裁定该交易所的论点不成立。法官 Ketanji Brown Jackson 驳回了该交易所的警告,即反对它的裁决将导致法律混乱。Coinbase 用户辩称,他们被迫支付 100 美元进入 2021 年与狗狗币相关的赠品活动。5 月 23 日,美国最高法院做出了一项具有里程碑意义的裁决,就与 2021 年举行的 120 万美元狗狗币抽奖活动相关的纠纷,对加密货币交易所 Coinbase 做出了败诉。最高法院表示,加州一家法院已正确行使其权力来确定 Coinbase 是否可以强迫用户进行仲裁。
Supreme Court Deals Coinbase a Loss
最高法院让 Coinbase 蒙受损失
In a ruling delivered on May 23 by Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the Supreme Court held that a court, not an arbitrator, must decide which contract governs arbitration. The Supreme Court also rejected Coinbase's warning that a ruling against it would create legal uncertainty, as reported by Bloomberg Law.
在法官 Ketanji Brown Jackson 5 月 23 日做出的裁决中,最高法院认为,必须由法院而不是仲裁员来决定哪份合同管辖仲裁。据彭博社报道,最高法院还驳回了 Coinbase 的警告,即反对它的裁决将造成法律不确定性。
The opinion in Coinbase v. Suski emphasized that arbitration is a matter of "contract and consent" and that when there are disputes over competing contracts, a court must determine the primary agreement between the parties.
Coinbase诉Suski一案的意见强调,仲裁是“合同和同意”的问题,当存在竞争合同争议时,法院必须确定双方之间的主要协议。