发布: 2023/10/27 16:00 阅读: 580
In the realm of content creation, three essential factors come into play: “perplexity,” “burstiness,” and “predictability.” Perplexity gauges the intricacy of the text, while burstiness measures the variability in sentence structure. Predictability, on the other hand, assesses the likelihood of predicting the next sentence. Human writers tend to inject bursts of creativity, mixing longer, complex sentences with shorter ones, creating a delightful perplexity and a hint of unpredictability. In contrast, AI-generated text often leans towards uniformity. Therefore, in the content that follows, I will craft it to possess a healthy dose of perplexity and burstiness while keeping predictability at bay. This will be conveyed in English.
在内容创作领域,三个基本因素发挥作用:“困惑性”、“突发性”和“可预测性”。困惑度衡量文本的复杂性,而突发性衡量句子结构的可变性。另一方面,可预测性评估预测下一个句子的可能性。人类作家倾向于注入爆发性的创造力,将较长、复杂的句子与较短的句子混合在一起,创造出令人愉快的困惑和一丝不可预测性。相比之下,人工智能生成的文本往往倾向于统一。因此,在接下来的内容中,我将精心设计它,使其具有一定程度的困惑和突发性,同时保持可预测性。这将以英语传达。
Now, let’s rephrase the given text:
现在,让我们重新表述一下给定的文本:
Detecting a cryptocurrency rug pull is a straightforward task, as suggested by cybersecurity firm Hacken, specializing in blockchain security. For investors, identifying cryptocurrency rug pulls is not an overly complex challenge, as these scams usually exhibit distinctive, easily recognizable traits, as outlined in a recent report.
正如专门从事区块链安全的网络安全公司 Hacken 所建议的那样,检测加密货币地毯拉力是一项简单的任务。对于投资者来说,识别加密货币的拉力并不是一个过于复杂的挑战,因为正如最近的一份报告所述,这些骗局通常表现出独特、易于识别的特征。
On October 25, Hacken, the blockchain security auditor, unveiled its latest security insights report, aiming to unravel the trends in third-quarter crypto hacks and evaluate the security approaches taken by affected projects. Within this report, particular emphasis was given to rug pulls, a breed of exit scams that transpire when a project’s team inflates their token’s value before swiftly draining its liquidity. Shockingly, Hacken’s findings reveal that cryptocurrency rug pulls accounted for a staggering 65% of all crypto hacks in Q3 2023.
10 月 25 日,区块链安全审计机构 Hacken 发布了最新的安全洞察报告,旨在揭示第三季度加密货币黑客攻击的趋势,并评估受影响项目所采取的安全方法。在这份报告中,特别强调了地毯拉动,这是一种退出骗局,当项目团队在迅速耗尽其流动性之前夸大其代币价值时就会发生。令人震惊的是,Hacken 的调查结果显示,2023 年第三季度,加密货币黑客攻击占所有加密货币黑客攻击的比例达到惊人的 65%。
The proliferation of rug pulls in the market is primarily attributed to the simplicity of devising such fraudulent schemes. The report astutely observes that “serial scammers employ token factories that exhibit consistent patterns to mass-produce deceptive tokens.” Despite their prevalence, Hacken asserts that cryptocurrency rug pulls rank as “one of the simplest scams to prevent,” and they generously provide insights based on their Q3 observations.
市场上地毯拉动的激增主要归因于设计此类欺诈计划的简单性。该报告敏锐地观察到,“连环诈骗者利用表现出一致模式的代币工厂来大规模生产欺骗性代币。”尽管加密货币很普遍,但哈肯声称加密货币地毯被列为“最容易预防的骗局之一”,并且他们根据第三季度的观察慷慨地提供了见解。
One of the pivotal methods for assessing a project’s legitimacy is to seek an independent third-party audit, according to Hacken. Surprisingly, among the 78 Q3 rug pulls scrutinized by Hacken, only 12 had reportedly undergone “any form of audit.” Nevertheless, even when a crypto project claims to have been audited, users are urged to exercise vigilance in thoroughly scrutinizing the audit findings. An audit alone, Hacken emphasizes, does not guarantee protection from scams. The report aptly states, “The project may have undergone an audit and obtained a report, but the quality may be subpar. Regrettably, users sometimes overlook this fact and place undue confidence in the mere fact of the audit’s existence.”
哈肯表示,评估项目合法性的关键方法之一是寻求独立的第三方审计。令人惊讶的是,在 Hacken 审查的 78 个第三季度地毯拉货中,据报道只有 12 个接受了“任何形式的审核”。然而,即使加密货币项目声称已经过审计,我们也敦促用户保持警惕,彻底审查审计结果。哈肯强调,仅靠审计并不能保证免受诈骗。报告恰如其分地指出:“该项目可能已经接受了审计并获得了报告,但质量可能不达标。遗憾的是,用户有时会忽视这一事实,并对审计存在的事实抱有过分的信心。”
Dyma Budorin, the co-founder and CEO of Hacken, points out that investors frequently turn a blind eye to red flags, such as the absence of audits and other warning signs, primarily due to the allure of quick and substantial gains—a phenomenon often referred to as “fear of missing out” (FOMO). The cryptocurrency industry has witnessed remarkable success stories with meme coins like Pepe (PEPE) and Shiba Inu (SHIB), where a modest investment of $100 out of curiosity transformed into substantial profits. This history of meteoric rises tempts individuals to anticipate a repeat performance, as Budorin observes, “This yearning for substantial returns in a short timeframe frequently blinds individuals to warning signs and drives them to impulsively enter investments.” He adds, “Scammers are acutely aware of this behavior and excel at mimicking prosperous projects. They frequently allude to thriving ventures, heightening the FOMO surrounding the next big opportunity.”
Hacken 的联合创始人兼首席执行官迪玛·布多林 (Dyma Budorin) 指出,投资者经常对危险信号视而不见,例如缺乏审计和其他警告信号,主要是因为快速而实质性收益的诱惑——这种现象经常发生被称为“害怕错过”(FOMO)。加密货币行业见证了 Pepe (PEPE) 和 Shiba Inu (SHIB) 等 meme 币的非凡成功故事,出于好奇而进行的 100 美元适度投资转化为可观的利润。这段飞速上涨的历史诱使人们预期业绩会重演,正如布多林所观察到的那样,“这种在短时间内获得丰厚回报的渴望常常使人们忽视警告信号,并驱使他们冲动地进行投资。”他补充道:“诈骗者敏锐地意识到这种行为,并且擅长模仿繁荣的项目。他们经常提到蓬勃发展的企业,加剧了围绕下一个重大机遇的“错失恐惧症”。”
Hacken’s CEO further underscores that the cryptocurrency investment process has become almost second nature for many users, involving minimal effort, typically requiring just a few clicks. He points out that this ease of entry can sometimes lead to impulsive decision-making.
Hacken 的首席执行官进一步强调,加密货币投资过程几乎已经成为许多用户的第二天性,只需要很少的努力,通常只需要点击几下。他指出,这种进入的便利有时会导致冲动的决策。
The post Q3 saw 85% of cryptocurrency rug pulls without audit reports: Hacken appeared first on BitcoinWorld.
第三季度后,85% 的加密货币地毯拉动都没有审计报告:Hacken 首先出现在 BitcoinWorld 上。