发布: 2024/05/24 06:19 阅读: 313
Supreme Court Rules Against Coinbase in Dogecoin Sweepstakes Dispute
最高法院在狗狗币抽奖纠纷中裁定 Coinbase 败诉
The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled against crypto exchange Coinbase in a dispute over its Dogecoin (DOGE) sweepstakes rules.
美国最高法院就加密货币交易所 Coinbase 的狗狗币 (DOGE) 抽奖规则争议做出了败诉。
Legal Proceedings
法律诉讼
According to legal documents obtained by Cornell Law, the Supreme Court unanimously determined that the conflict between Coinbase's sweepstakes contract and user agreement must be adjudicated through the court system.
根据康奈尔法学院获得的法律文件,最高法院一致裁定,Coinbase的抽奖合同与用户协议之间的冲突必须通过法院系统裁决。
Justice Jackson's Statement
杰克逊法官的声明
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson explained:
科坦吉·布朗·杰克逊法官解释道:
"Arbitration is a matter of contract and consent, and we have long held that disputes are subject to arbitration if, and only if, the parties actually agreed to arbitrate those disputes. Here, then, before either the delegation provision or the forum selection clause can be enforced, a court needs to decide what the parties have agreed to."
“仲裁是合同和同意的问题,我们长期以来一直认为,当且仅当双方实际上同意对这些争议进行仲裁时,争议才可以接受仲裁。那么,在授权条款或法院选择条款之前能否强制执行,法院需要对双方同意的内容做出裁决。”
Sweepstakes Controversy
抽奖争议
The dispute arose from Coinbase's 2021 Dogecoin sweepstakes, which allegedly contained conflicting rules compared to the exchange's user agreement.
该争议源于 Coinbase 2021 年狗狗币抽奖活动,据称该活动包含与交易所用户协议相冲突的规则。
User Agreement and Sweepstakes Rules
用户协议及抽奖规则
Coinbase's user agreement, which users must accept before creating an account, requires that disputes be resolved through arbitration. However, the DOGE sweepstakes rules stated that disputes must be handled through California's court system.
用户在创建账户之前必须接受Coinbase的用户协议,该协议要求通过仲裁解决争议。然而,DOGE 抽奖规则规定,争议必须通过加州法院系统处理。
Class Action Lawsuit and Court Proceedings
集体诉讼和法庭诉讼
A class action lawsuit was filed against Coinbase, alleging that the sweepstakes violated the law. Coinbase attempted to resolve the dispute through arbitration based on its user agreement, but a District Court denied the motion. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the District Court's decision.
有人对 Coinbase 提起集体诉讼,指控抽奖活动违反了法律。 Coinbase 试图根据其用户协议通过仲裁解决争议,但地方法院驳回了该动议。第九巡回上诉法院维持了地方法院的裁决。
Supreme Court Ruling
最高法院裁决
While the Supreme Court declined to comment on the Ninth Circuit's reasoning, it ruled that a court must ultimately determine the parties' agreement.
虽然最高法院拒绝对第九巡回法院的推理发表评论,但它裁定法院必须最终确定双方的协议。
"Homing in on the conflict between the delegation clause in the first contract and the forum selection clause in the second, the question becomes whether the parties agreed to send the given dispute to arbitration. And that question must be answered by a court."
“针对第一份合同中的授权条款与第二份合同中的法院选择条款之间的冲突,问题变成了双方是否同意将特定争议提交仲裁。而这个问题必须由法院来回答。”
Source:
来源:
https://thebittimes.com/us-supreme-court-rules-against-coinbase-in-dogecoin-sweepstakes-dispute-tbt89480.html
https://thebittimes.com/us-supreme-court-rules-against-coinbase-in-dogecoin-sweepstakes-dispute-tbt89480.html